杉浦真平
@ShinpeiSugiura
·
Now
3of3
There is a difference between a word and a data, exactly. Because there is accountability between AI and us, the data is not capable of conquering (the recognition of) human beings as well as the world, according to the particularization of data."
杉浦真平
@ShinpeiSugiura
·
Now
2of3
Of course, the killing field is universal, not personal to my experience, and it is the same as the device. There is a difference in the interpretation of the word "universal." The word "universal" is data for the device, but for human beings, it is a word.
杉浦真平
@ShinpeiSugiura
·
Now
1of3
"There is a difference in recognition between human beings and artificial intelligence, (the world is) killing field or not. I am a human, which contains flesh, but AI is an artificial mechanical device.
杉浦真平
@ShinpeiSugiura
·
Now
4of4
However, according to "To be or not to be, that is the question," human males are always on the killing field."
杉浦真平
@ShinpeiSugiura
·
Now
3of4
In fact, now there is no marginalization of the world that is established only by human females, and I dare not say that it is not necessary to inaugurate human males, therefore.
杉浦真平
@ShinpeiSugiura
·
Now
2of4
How them? They contract their biological self-identity (as human females), and in my opinion, the development of society is protecting (of) women like that. Without human males' hostility, human females (and human beings) are intermediate.
杉浦真平
@ShinpeiSugiura
·
Now
1of4
"I quit adopting an opportunity for a woman. Needless to say, a woman does not need me, and I do not need a woman. The concept of opportunity must take women to the killing field for granted.
